Pilot feedback
Help improve this inventory
Deletion request: If you opted into research storage, include a respondent ID, session ID, or result link if you have one. Do not include raw answer text unless it is needed to identify the record.
This pilot is testing the architecture as much as the wording. The most useful feedback is not just whether the top label felt right, but whether the profile, shorthand labels, module structure, and overall framing felt honest and useful.
The most useful feedback covers six things
- What result you expected before taking the inventory
- Whether the core profile fit better than the tradition label
- Which part felt most wrong: profile, label, style, or the whole structure
- Whether political economy here should read as a worldview, a lens, or both
- Which question or case pushed you in the wrong direction
- What felt missing, under-modeled, or structurally off
If the whole architecture felt wrong, that is especially useful feedback. You do not need to translate it into a better-fitting label first.
Friend-testing note: If you tried this with a friend, classmate, or seminar partner, the most useful note is where two people with similar instincts still diverged because of one prompt, tradeoff, or label.
Time: About two to three minutes. No required fields. Blunt reactions are more useful than polite agreement.
Privacy: The Google Form does not ask for your name or email by default. Do not include identifying details unless you want follow-up or are requesting deletion. Feedback is separate from opt-in research answer storage; raw quiz answers are not sent to third-party analytics. If you are requesting deletion of opt-in research data, include your respondent ID, session ID, or result link if available.
Direct contact
Prefer to write directly? The links below reach JinHua Yip. This is most useful for longer feedback, collaboration inquiries, or pilot arrangements.