IR Worldview Inventory

Menu

Product path

Browse Cases, build a Foundation baseline, and add Focus Areas, AI Governance, or Perspective Runs where useful.

CasesFoundationFocus AreasAI GovernancePerspective RunsMy Profile

Browse and context

Use the Worldview Map, the field guide, and methods when you want to browse profiles or challenge the model.

Worldview MapThinkers & public positionsExploreFuturesMethodsPrivacyReferencesCorrections and contact
简体中文

AI Governance Compass

Compare your judgments on frontier AI governance

22 questions. Around 8 minutes.

The questions cover eight axes: risk horizon, deployment pace, oversight, geopolitics, openness, military use, legitimacy, and human future.

Take the AI CompassBrowse the AI Atlas →

To compare this result with your wider foreign-policy judgments, take the IR Foundation.

Who gets access? →

Make a release decision for a fictional research institute, then reconsider who controls evaluator admissions. An unscored exercise you can open without taking the Compass.

Same overall project

AI belongs beside the IR baseline

The Foundation records a broad view of world politics. The AI Governance Compass records judgments about frontier-AI governance on its own domain scale.

Current IR baseline

No Foundation result saved yet

You can take AI on its own. It reads better beside a saved Foundation result.

What changes here

The AI result does not rewrite the Foundation. Without a reviewed bridge, the two records sit side by side and no relationship is inferred between them.

What it coversPosition statements and scenarios map eight governance dimensions, from risk horizon to human future.
How long it takesStandard is the cleaner first pass. Advanced adds denser prompts and more specific tradeoffs.
What it does not claimThe result does not certify expertise or reduce the whole field to one permanent identity.

Choose your route

Start in Standard or Advanced mode

Both modes use the same axes. Advanced adds more specific prompts on audits, compute, incident reporting, security competition, infrastructure, and legitimacy.

Standard

Clear first pass

16 statements and 22 questions. Plain-language prompts across all eight dimensions.

Open Standard →

Advanced

Denser framing and more specific tradeoffs

28 statements and 37 questions total. Deeper prompts on audits, compute governance, security competition, and legitimacy under pressure.

Open Advanced →

Optional depth

Where the AI Compass connects to the rest of the project

Read this result beside the IR Foundation and Focus Area records. Each keeps its own domain scale; the Profile does not combine them into a master score.

Futures catalogueCompare desired conditions and expectations across possible worlds.Foundation QuestionnaireOpen the shared IR baseline.Security and TechnologySee the IR issue modules that sit beside AI.ProfileKeep saved IR and AI results in one place.AI Field GuideRead the axes, limits, and under-modeled perspectives.MethodsRead the guardrails and scope notes behind the whole project.ReferencesUse the bibliography while comparing positions.Corrections and contactReport a factual, privacy, or security problem.