Security and Technology

An ally asks for troops on its border. A ministry decides whether to fund public compute. You choose, and the result shows which logic you kept returning to. Each questionnaire gives its own result and leaves your Foundation result alone.

Security

Deterrence, alliances, sanctions, and the use of force.

Each case is set at a real table: a NATO ministerial choosing an eastern-flank posture, a coastal state deciding whose help to accept, a monitoring team watching a ceasefire fray.

Start Security

Standard: 19 cases, 18 to 24 minutes. Advanced: 23 cases, 24 to 30 minutes.

The result reads three things: How you handle probing, coercion, and crisis ceilings.; How exposed partners, coalition durability, and hedging space should be read.; How you weigh order, legal authority, civilian protection, and bounded action.

Technology

Export controls, chips, open models, sovereign clouds, and who writes the rules for AI.

Each case is a budget or an access decision: a cabinet deciding whether to build a sovereign cloud, a research board choosing how far to open a capable model, a ministry signing for data-centre capacity it cannot build itself.

Start Technology

Standard: 9 cases, 8 to 10 minutes. Advanced: 15 cases, 14 to 18 minutes.

The result reads three things: How you read chokepoints, openness, restriction, and strategic dependence.; How you think durable advantage is built, financed, and distributed.; How you weigh shared rules, access gaps, deployment limits, and enforceable guardrails.

Already have results? Open Profile. For who should govern powerful AI, AI Governance is its own questionnaire.