Focus Areas

Add a focused issue read beside the Foundation

Use Security and Technology to examine concrete policy judgments. Each result remains a separate domain record and leaves the Foundation unchanged.

What Focus Areas coverSecurity and Technology begin from familiar policy debates, then record a focused read across a smaller number of domain-specific lanes.
How long it takesStandard is the shorter issue read. Advanced adds extra cases and a smaller number of questions asked from a defined actor’s position.
What it does not claimA Focus Area result is an issue read, not a better or truer Foundation result.

Available Focus Areas

Choose a policy area to examine first

Each Focus Area produces its own issue record. No Focus Area score is translated onto the Foundation scale.

Security

Security, Strategy, and Statecraft

A focused read on deterrence, alliances, escalation, and the legitimacy of force

The cases examine deterrence, alliances, escalation, and legitimacy through scored issue judgments and separately reported perspective modeling.

Open Security questionnaire

Use this when you want a more concrete read than the Foundation alone can give.

What it covers
Deterrence and escalation · Alliances and autonomy · Order, legitimacy, and protection
How long it takes
Standard: 18 to 24 minutes · Advanced: 24 to 30 minutes
19 standard questions · 23 advanced questions
What it does not claim
a fixed security identity that overrides the Foundation baseline.

Technology

Technology, AI, and Geoeconomics

A focused read on chokepoints, industrial policy, AI governance, and strategic dependence

The cases examine chokepoints, industrial policy, AI governance, and strategic dependence from the positions of sanctioned states, middle powers, and nonaligned actors.

Open Technology questionnaire

Use this when you want a more concrete read than the Foundation alone can give.

What it covers
Controls and dependence · Capacity and industrial policy · Governance, access, and safety
How long it takes
Standard: 8 to 10 minutes · Advanced: 14 to 18 minutes
9 standard questions · 15 advanced questions
What it does not claim
a stable technology identity that overrides the Foundation baseline.

Planned next

Future modules stay visible, but they are not live in this round

The next additions are grouped by function and region. They are roadmap entries, not live routes.

Functional track

Add more issue areas before broadening into regions

Functional modules extend the same separate-record structure without changing the frame of the project.

International Economics and Finance

Planned

A geoeconomic issue read on trade, finance, sanctions, industrial policy, and economic statecraft.

Governance, Politics, and Society

Planned

A domestic-order issue read on institutions, legitimacy, polarization, and state capacity under stress.

Development, Climate, and Sustainability

Planned

A cross-border issue read on growth, resilience, climate pressure, and competing development priorities.

Regional track

Regional lenses come after the underlying language is clearer

Regional modules introduce harder interpretation questions. They stay planned until the core product language is clearer.

China

Planned

A regional lens on how your baseline travels when Chinese strategy, institutions, and historical memory move to the center.

Middle East

Planned

A regional lens on order, rivalry, deterrence, and state survival across a dense security environment.

Africa

Planned

A regional lens on development, sovereignty, external influence, and uneven institutional capacity.

Europe and Eurasia

Planned

A regional lens on alliance politics, continental security, border revision, and institutional constraint.

Asia

Planned

A regional lens on maritime order, balancing behavior, development strategy, and strategic interdependence.

Americas

Planned

A regional lens on hemispheric order, democratic stress, migration, and economic integration.

United States

Planned

A domestic-regional lens on how baseline assumptions hold up inside U.S. strategic debate and statecraft.

Best next additions after this round: International Economics and Finance on the functional side, then China as the first regional flagship.

Same product family

The AI companion and browse surfaces stay adjacent to the IR records

The AI Governance Compass runs alongside the IR Foundation and issue records. The field guide and Profile keep the whole product legible rather than scattering the pieces across separate experiences.